Hallo Martin,

Du schriebst am Fri, 8 Nov 2013 06:46:55 +0100:

> > You might opt to spell it out as "integer", I think.
> >
> That is not better IMHO. uint, sint -> uinteger, sinteger.
> What about unum, snum?

I rather thought about using "integer" as a name for the "signed int" C-ish
type _only_. The unsigned whole number type should be named differently,
although I must admit not to have a very good name myself. One might think
of "cardinal", for example, but that has some conotation mathematically
(cardinality of sets, e.g.). Anyway, that makes it a number type with a
lower bound, as is required for positive-only whole numbers.

> > (Didn't you set out to recreate a _Pascal_ compiler? Then that's how it
..
> We create a future compiler for the MSEide+MSEgui project. In a first

Ok, I got that now. Although I'm not convinced that "yet another [tool kit]
specific language" (a "YA[TK]SL"?) is really required. I'd opt for a full
implementation of Algol 68 instead, as this had nearly everything ever
conceived for any programming language, and more... ;->
Except objects and classes.

-- 
-- 
(Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung
nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz
-----------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk

Reply via email to