On Monday 11 November 2013 11:42:58 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 11/11/2013 10:53 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > > Because if there is a "u" for unsigned there must be a "s" for signed > > (orthogonality). But "int" is already signed (as Sieghard pointed out) > > so "sint" is bad. > > While I do see you point, IMHO this is trading strictness vs > readability, and thus a matter of taste, and this given I still vote for > the traditional (C) but unambiguous naming. > card32, int32 is based on Pascal types and unambiguous too. cardinal, integer -> recommended type, card, int -> size of the CPU registers.
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
