On 11/15/2013 02:00 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > Why? Do you never work with variant records? No. > There and with records > generally "with" is a good aid to structure the code. > Anyway: sorry for not being clear enough. I meant the "with" keyword for denoting the record the fields denoted afterward are owned by.
Exactly in this instance an intermediate variable/alias (which the Oberon "with" introduces) comes handy. But as said a more commonly usable syntax (defining a pointer on the fly) is not worse in this case and additionally usable in other cases. -Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
