On 11/15/2013 09:40 PM, Sieghard wrote: > And yet, there are - probabely still just as many - C programmers that > don't trust their compilers a bit. Including myself. But my way of handling this is doing "nice" code and in critical cases after compiling checking the resulting ASM code it the result is as desired. If it is not, I consider some hand-optimization. (but mostly it is rather perfect.)
> And then, there are the myriad of compilers for special systems, > non-PC CPUs, microcontrollers, Nowadays mostly based in the gnu engine. Thus the high-level optimization (including the arch-independent stuff we have been talking about here) is the same. > even hardware devices - you know there's a version of C++ for FPGA > programming? e.g -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impulse_C > Err - agree with _what_? To not use it? I'd be inclined to use the Oberon "with alias" but I'd never use the highly ambiguous original Pascal syntax "naked" "with" syntax. -Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
