Hallo Michael, Du schriebst am Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:06:52 +0100:
[A whole lot about compiler optimizations] > Decent C programmers do take advantage of this to make their source code > more readable. And yet, there are - probabely still just as many - C programmers that don't trust their compilers a bit. Even such that use gcc, which isn't really renowned as completely fault free anyway. And then, there are the myriad of compilers for special systems, non-PC CPUs, microcontrollers, even hardware devices - you know there's a version of C++ for FPGA programming? > > But anyway, the Pascal style "with" allows you to keep your source > > free from naming clutter when the context is clear. If you don't think > > a "with" makes the code easier to understand, simply _don't use it_. > > It is _not_ required in any way. > > When replacing "Pascal style 'with' " by "Oberon style 'with' " which > Martin seems to plan, I do agree. Err - agree with _what_? To not use it? -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
