Hallo Michael, Du schriebst am Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:10:29 +0100:
> Using a procedure name without "()" can be either a call to this > procedure or denote the address of this procedure to be moved onto a > procedure variable. It will be what was defined for it to be. > (With fpc you need to add @ for the second, which I think is extremely > ugly.) But it is thoroughly consistent with the use of "@" with variables, where it returns their address as well. This makes the C approach (above) look inconsistent. -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
