On 11/21/2013 10:50 PM, Sieghard wrote: > Hallo Michael, > > Du schriebst am Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:10:29 +0100: > >> Using a procedure name without "()" can be either a call to this >> procedure or denote the address of this procedure to be moved onto a >> procedure variable. > It will be what was defined for it to be. > >> (With fpc you need to add @ for the second, which I think is extremely >> ugly.) > But it is thoroughly consistent with the use of "@" with variables, where > it returns their address as well. > This makes the C approach (above) look inconsistent. Is this really you speaking ?
Dealing with explicit pointers is a typical way of C programming. It's a beauty of Pascal that this usually is not necessary (i.e. hidden behind other concepts such as object instance and "with"). -Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
