On Friday 28 February 2014 22:25:29 Ivanko B wrote: > Now it works and me can compare FPIMAGE & GM versions. GM is approx > 2.5 times as faster in the testcase. > Both versions load CPU cores similarily, BTW. So GM wins by better > alghorithms. > Most likely the time to transfer the image from GM memory to screen and the time for the server side scaling to fit the timage area dominate. If I compare only the image conversion time I often see a factor of 10 or more. Try to load in a small rectangle by calling function readgmgraphic() with awidth and aheight <=100 where the converted image will be scaled down before to be sent to the screen, switch off al_fit and remove the timage.update() call, it will be much faster.
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
