On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Martin Schreiber <mse00...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: >> >> It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to >> do the work. >> > Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and possibly redundant "class". > You are against the "class" which eliminates the explicit "^" dereference and > you are against the "^" which eliminates the uncertainty of value/reference > object item access with the same notation. :-)
Because I thought that was possible to have just one notation using "object". :) Let's think more about it... Marcos Douglas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
