When a C++ program is slower than its counterpart in Java, its always because the C++ implementation is weak. Java cannot be faster than machine code and a good C++ implementation must be equivalent to machine code.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 17:29, Graeme Geldenhuys < [email protected]> wrote: > On 05/02/2019 16:19, Noel Frankinet wrote: > > Java faster than C++ ? > > Yes, it is a common misconception that Java is slow. Just because Java > from 1995-2000 was slow (some 20+ years ago), doesn't mean the new Java > of recent years are. In fact, the recent Java is actually really fast > (in compiling and runtime code). IBM, Sun, Oracle and many more have > spent billions on $$ in improving Java - and it paid off! > > Java is well known for real-time robotics, banking, stock trading etc... > Performance is vital in all those fields. > > What is also massively impressive about Java's compiler, is that it can > optimise pretty shitty code and still end up with a high performance > application. > > > Regards, > Graeme > > -- > fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal > http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ > > My public PGP key: http://tinyurl.com/graeme-pgp > > > _______________________________________________ > mseide-msegui-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk > -- Noël Frankinet Strategis sprl 0478/90.92.54
_______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
