Hallo Sieghard. > ... > The error is the omission of a "-" > sign in front of the switch "XlS",
Oooops, indeed, fixed just now in Lazarus forum. https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,61069.msg459333.html#msg459333 Thanks to note it. > And got rather disappointed. The llvm-based compiler did WORSE innearly all > respects. Yes, indeed, without any optimization, fpc-llvm does worse than "pure" fpc. All changes with optimization -O3 and -O4. Note that llvm "is" optimization, without it there is no sense to use it. I did some test with float calculations and the difference was big (much better for fpc-llvm) when adding -O3 or -O4 parameters. Many thanks for your test Sieghard. Fre;D
_______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
