On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Matus: >>Is it necessary to invoke new dependencies on third party libraries? > > It's better than reinvent the wheel, risk new (security) bugs etc.
Socks5 code itself is very small. Reviewing a cut/paste to spec from OpenBSD/nc or any other compatible inclusion wouldn't be hard. And whether socks5 written from nothing, copied, or included via library, you still have to make a bunch of changes to msmtp to hook it in. So I don't buy this. >> Especially one that hasn't been maintained since 2005? > This one _is_ an issue. This additional drawback to 'third party'... when sourceforge/antinat vanishes, nobody can build because some rare tarball gone. Better to literally just add socks5 code to msmtp/mpop repo. > libsocksd0 from dante package Dante is on my socks5 list to look at. It's linked from the WP SOCKS page. As is this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_proxifiers > libproxychains3 from proxychains package Dead since 2006. And does anyone really go to the work of using such manual and generally illicit chains rather than Tor/VPN's? I'd bet you could 'torsocks torsocks' with dual configs. So probably see maintained torsocks instead. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ msmtp-users mailing list msmtp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/msmtp-users
