On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 09:25:33PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:04 PM, CustaiCo <custa...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > > To just yank in somebody's code and bloat the code > > base with a bunch of proxy code seems pretty pointless. > > Once you exec msmtp it's in there anyways. Guess I don't > see a problem with putting the little bit of socks5 in msmtp > directly. It's not like socks5 RFC will ever change, for which > I could see handing that off to external library people (if it > was actually maintained). > > If antinat does meet socks5 RFC spec, gives IPv6 and DNS > through it, msmtp gets --socks5 option, and you could bundle > antinat tarball/code with msmtp and have it build in one shot, > that could work. But it's not really any different.
I'm right now looking at seeing if i can get it working with the source from proxychains. The nice thing about that approach is I basically don't have to touch the tls code at all. After proxychains has done its work I'm left with a normal socket that I can just pass to gnutls or whatever. > > torsocks and proxychains are exactly the type of thing I was trying to > > avoid. > > I meant that, as with nc (etc), torsocks was another well maintained > place to get socks5 client code from, it's GPLv2. > > Not sure if torsocks supports IPv6 yet, which would be needed for > clearnet, CJDNS, Phantom and OnionCat/GarliCat. > > Due to current maintenance, of all the LD_PRELOAD apps, torsocks > seems the best preloader if you're stuck with using that method. Yeah dante was huge. I ended up with nearly 2 megabyte library to link with with compiling it with just the socks client code only. proxychains *should* be working soonish as long as long as I don't get blocked getting it to link without issues. It took me a little while to get it to build, but the fact that the unlinked library is only 81kb is very promising. I gave nmaps netcat a look but its license was not compatible. It was GPL2 only. I was given a friendly reminder that msmpt is GPL3 and GPL3 and GLP2 are not compatible. proxysocks has the needed 'version Y or higher' language needed to make them play nice. > > Plus, a lazy I2P user would just use susimail anyway. :P > > Yes, there are times to interface with clearnet, others to not. Well, even a careful person didn't have much choice but to use web-mail even with i2pbote until recently. CustaiCo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ msmtp-users mailing list msmtp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/msmtp-users
