Damn, it got me again. I think this exact problem hit me a couple of months ago. Precedence stupid!! Heh Thanks to all! -Mark
-----Original Message----- From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Néri Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:51 PM To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mspgcc-users] Re: Possible problem w/ ++ increment "Mark Stokes" <m.sto...@ieee.org> writes: > I've been pulling my hair out about an auto increment problem. I > finally realized the following statement wasn't acting as I expected it [snip] > *address++; [snip] > Is this a bug? No, it's not a bug; ++ has higher precedence than *. That's why you can do things like char *s; s = "this is a test"; while (*s != '\0') putchar(*s++); So, to get what you want, you could write (*address)++; but IMO, your "fix" looks nicer: *address += 1; Regards, --Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
