Why don't you try GPS instead of Insight? With it you can always use the newest msp430-gdb available.
-----Mensaje original----- De: Matthias Weingart [mailto:msp...@pentax.boerde.de] Enviado el: Miércoles, 02 de Junio de 2004 12:04 p.m. Para: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Asunto: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Problems with msp430-gdbproxy On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:32:13AM +0200, nobo...@web.de wrote: > Hi, > > mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 31.05.04 20:50:22: > > > > Hi Rolf, > > 1) Speed: > > These lines should fix your speed problem, many people have already > > mentioned them ;-) > > > > set remote memory-write-packet-size 1024 > > set remote memory-write-packet-size fixed > > set remote memory-read-packet-size 1024 > > set remote memory-read-packet-size fixed > > Ok, it's significant better but approx. 6 times slower than the IAR debugger. > Because i have to work with f149 code which has less than 100 B flash free it's still very slow. I tried older version of gdbproxy that were significantly faster (but didnt have newer devices). The version with 1.3MB size is the fastest. It seems that newer versions are getting slower and slower. I have no idea why, seems to be that code Steve uses from TI to build gdbproxy is getter slower and slower. My collection is here: www.boerde.de/~matthias/files However, insight is not really useable ;-) M. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
