Hi,

with the IAR debugger the same code is flashed in 10 seconds - 5 times faster!
But it's not the same because the IAR debugger only works most of the tries 
(approx. 40 %) and sometimes not for several minutes.

Rolf

mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 02.06.04 17:19:32:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:32:13AM +0200, nobo...@web.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 31.05.04 20:50:22:
> > > 
> > > Hi Rolf,
> > > 1) Speed:
> > > These lines should fix your speed problem, many people have already
> > > mentioned them ;-)
> > > 
> > > set remote memory-write-packet-size 1024
> > > set remote memory-write-packet-size fixed
> > > set remote memory-read-packet-size 1024
> > > set remote memory-read-packet-size fixed
> > 
> > Ok, it's significant better but approx. 6 times slower than the IAR 
> > debugger.
> > Because i have to work with f149 code which has less than 100 B flash free 
> > it's still very slow.
> 
> I tried older version of gdbproxy that were significantly faster (but didnt
> have newer devices). The version with 1.3MB size is the fastest.
> It seems that newer versions are getting slower and slower. I have
> no idea why, seems to be that code Steve uses from TI to build gdbproxy is
> getter slower and slower. My collection is here: www.boerde.de/~matthias/files
> 
> However, insight is not really useable ;-)
> 
> M.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
> installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
> evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
> _______________________________________________
> Mspgcc-users mailing list
> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users




Reply via email to