Hi, with the IAR debugger the same code is flashed in 10 seconds - 5 times faster! But it's not the same because the IAR debugger only works most of the tries (approx. 40 %) and sometimes not for several minutes.
Rolf mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 02.06.04 17:19:32: > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:32:13AM +0200, nobo...@web.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 31.05.04 20:50:22: > > > > > > Hi Rolf, > > > 1) Speed: > > > These lines should fix your speed problem, many people have already > > > mentioned them ;-) > > > > > > set remote memory-write-packet-size 1024 > > > set remote memory-write-packet-size fixed > > > set remote memory-read-packet-size 1024 > > > set remote memory-read-packet-size fixed > > > > Ok, it's significant better but approx. 6 times slower than the IAR > > debugger. > > Because i have to work with f149 code which has less than 100 B flash free > > it's still very slow. > > I tried older version of gdbproxy that were significantly faster (but didnt > have newer devices). The version with 1.3MB size is the fastest. > It seems that newer versions are getting slower and slower. I have > no idea why, seems to be that code Steve uses from TI to build gdbproxy is > getter slower and slower. My collection is here: www.boerde.de/~matthias/files > > However, insight is not really useable ;-) > > M. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one > installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users