Svein E. Seldal wrote:
[...]
When I read the manual, it doesnt tell you very much (chapter 1.2 and
11.1-11.2). And quite francly, since a 3.3.x and 3.4.x version is
available, I guessed that the docs is obsolete and a newer
reccommendation is available.
IMHO a little note that the newer versions aren't stable/working would
be good. In that manner you'd inform the users that this doc is still
updated and they would trust the source saying that gcc 3.2.3 is still
in the game.
I've been thinking about this some more, and it seems really sad. So
many projects have no documentation. When you do produce some meaningful
documentation people assume its worthless junk. What is a developer
supposed to do? I don't mean this as a criticism of Svein. Lots of
projects are abandoned, and it isn't always easy to tell the mature and
slowly changing things from the abandoned junk. Grrrrrrrh.
Regards,
Steve
