Dmitry wrote:

Fellows,

I almost finished porting gcc-4.xx.
This has been completely rewritten ;)

This will have some new features PLUS some intrising call will be modified
(for example - registers passing scheme for mult/div routines as well as hardware multiplier has been changed). Therefore, please avoid direct assembly calls and gcc-specific definitions in header files.
Good news. I have been getting GDB support working this week for the the current CVS head version of GDB. I want to try and keep up with CVS and get supported merged this time. The GDB 5.1.1 support was very robust, but the GDB 6.0 support was never fully debugged. I want to get this one really sorted out and into the main CVS as soon as possible (i.e. before they start chaging too much again).

How does the code produced by GCC 4.xx look? GCC 3.2.3 seems to do better than 3.3.x. 3.4.x didn't show much improvement. Is 4.x a worthwhile change?

Regards,
Steve


Reply via email to