Actually we have compilers for other platforms (Solaris and Linux), they're just not as well advertised.
___________________________________________ Chris Recoskie Software Designer Texas Instruments, Toronto http://eclipse.org/cdt > -----Original Message----- > From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:mspgcc-users- > ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Grant Edwards > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:40 AM > To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Mspgcc-users] Re: MSP430FG461X > > On 2006-03-24, Recoskie, Chris <crecos...@ti.com> wrote: > > > We already had compiler technology for other instruction set > > architectures that we reused. I don't think this is really > > the appropriate place to get into a pitch about why we think > > our compiler is better than someone else's but I'll just say > > that we have a lot of features that we feel are compelling. > > Features like "forces you to use MS Windows". ;) > > > I can't really comment as to that as that's all handled by the > > MSP430 team and I really don't have anything to do with the > > support of the MSPGCC project. I'm just a lowly tools > > engineer :-P > > And we're just lowly customers. :( > > -- > Grant Edwards grante Yow! My mind is a > potato > at field... > visi.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
