I forgot the following: ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- Von: Peter Bigot Gesendet am: 19 Feb 2012 20:37:45
>> At this time, I expect this change to be permanent. > Jumps, though---jumps are just broken, because the documented behavior > of "jmp 4" and "jmp label" is fundamentally inconsistent with the > expectation that a symbol can substitute for a constant. This substitution is true for absolute addressing, but not for relative addressing. JMP is relative. Always. There is no absolute mode for JMP. You may use MOV #symbol,PC if you want an absolute jmp. The whole MSP nomenclature does not fit for the JMP instruction, since JMP x is rather JMP #(x-2) since the parameter for the JMP is not fetched from the passed address. There is no way to make it 'consistent'. The same way as POP is an emulated instruction while PUSH isn't. But I prefer having both (JMP and PUSH) rather than having a consistent model :) JMGross ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
