On 2017-03-24, Bob von Knobloch <b...@vknobloch.de> wrote:
> On 23/03/17 15:10, David W. Schultz wrote:
>> The family guides have complete descriptions. In this case slau144.
> Thanks David, I seem to have missed that, it is indeed a proper description.
> Thanks for all the help. The TI compiler is still no good - the 
> interrupts are still taking much longer that the old compiler and the 
> code size is still much bigger.

After seeing the mess they made of Code Composter, I can't say I'm
surprised they've mulched the gcc port.

> The enhancements that I wanted to do to the target can, seemingly, only 
> be achieved with the old compiler at this time.
> I'll give up on the TI one and keep looking in case it improves.

I predict it will get worse and worse until it gets forked and
somebody else fixes it.

Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Is my fallout shelter
                                  at               termite proof?

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Mspgcc-users mailing list

Reply via email to