Tried that with 2007.  That introduced a 15-20% image failure rate so we turned 
it off.

Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling

What about multicast?




From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:05 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling

Enable branch cache.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 11:41 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling

It could.  My main concern from an operational standpoint is not slowing down 
the imaging that we do every day.  I'm looking to strike a balance so that we 
don't cause network issues but that the same time don't degrade imaging.  I 
assume I could set BITS to 256,000Kbs to achieve a setting similar to what we 
have now.

Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling

BITS wont help with that?  Rate limiting?




From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:07 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] Download throttling

I am looking for a little guidance on how to control network throttling in 
SCCM2012.  In our current SCCM 2007 setup, we have IIS throttled at 256Mbs (IIS 
setting, not SCCM).  This keeps the switch in the server rack from getting 
hammered, and the other servers in the rack from suffering connectivity issues. 
 I know that anything that runs from a DP will bypass that of course, but just 
about everything we deploy uses download end execute.  Any insight is 
appreciated, thanks.

Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State




________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Reply via email to