Wondering if things are any better on Server 2012? I think I will try the BITS throttling to begin with and work from there.
Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fusco, Brendan Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling We had the same experience. Extremely frustrating. WDS multicast does not seem to be very robust, particularly with larger images. Brendan A. Fusco Sr. Systems Administrator DePaul University, Information Services [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Tuesday, 4 June, 2013 2:05 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling It's 100% Cisco :). It did work it was just inconsistent. Image downloads would bomb out, techs got tired of having to restart the image process. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:47 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling It only works if your network gear supports it. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:18 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling Tried that with 2007. That introduced a 15-20% image failure rate so we turned it off. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:57 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling What about multicast? From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:05 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling Enable branch cache. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 11:41 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling It could. My main concern from an operational standpoint is not slowing down the imaging that we do every day. I'm looking to strike a balance so that we don't cause network issues but that the same time don't degrade imaging. I assume I could set BITS to 256,000Kbs to achieve a setting similar to what we have now. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:14 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Download throttling BITS wont help with that? Rate limiting? From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:07 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Download throttling I am looking for a little guidance on how to control network throttling in SCCM2012. In our current SCCM 2007 setup, we have IIS throttled at 256Mbs (IIS setting, not SCCM). This keeps the switch in the server rack from getting hammered, and the other servers in the rack from suffering connectivity issues. I know that anything that runs from a DP will bypass that of course, but just about everything we deploy uses download end execute. Any insight is appreciated, thanks. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
