Back in the day of unreliable KVM solutions, you learned keyboard shortcuts 
REAL QUICK!

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 5:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser vice

windows is a point and click mouse driven program

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Trevor Sullivan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
So then the question becomes: why are you using the mouse so heavily? If you
learn to be efficient on the keyboard, you will be surprised at how much
faster you can get certain tasks done. Do you point and click for every
formatting option you use in Microsoft Office, even though a very
comprehensive keyboard navigation solution has been available for the past
6+ years (Office 2007)? I sure don't.



Are you going to choose to start using the keyboard, and instantaneously
become a wizard? No. Will you learn common keyboard shortcuts over a couple
of weeks, by consciously choosing to keep your hand off the mouse, and
finding a better way to accomplish your goals? Yes.



DON'T try to remember every single keyboard shortcut.

DO try to remember the common keyboard shortcuts that you personally use.



As far as the operating system goes, you only need three shortcuts in
Windows 8:



[Win] (or [Win] + Q) = Search Programs

[Win] + W = Search Settings

[Win] + F = Search Files



That's really not so hard, is it? The first one has been there since
Windows Vista ... just hit the [Win] key, and start typing. If you haven't
already been doing that for years, then you're pretty far behind already.
It's time to play catch-up, and stop living in the "classic" start menu that
hasn't fundamentally changed since 1995.



Bonus: [Win] + X + ??? = Management tools menu (in Windows 8.1, they even
replaced "Command Prompt" with "PowerShell (as Administrator)" I believe!!)



"Browsing" is for people who have no idea what they're looking for.
"Searching" is for people who know what they want, and are trying to find
it.



Cheers,

Trevor Sullivan

 <http://trevorsullivan.net/>     <http://twitter.com/pcgeek86>
<http://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan>
<https://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096>



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 9:14 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



The difference though is the number of clicks and mouse movements required.
I never really used 'Pin to Start' in Win7 I just used run or browsed the
start menu. The problem I have now is that the few items I did browse for,
that 'browsing' the start screen experience takes a lot longer. It would be
like if I was browsing a menu and all the items are expanded, it takes
forever if I don't try to search for it! Then when I do search, it only
shows 'Apps' and I have an extra click for 'Settings'. Overall, it just
takes me more time to find and open apps.



Daniel Ratliff



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



The start menu was *never* a concise list of apps - you just got used to
digging through it. Why not pin your apps to the taskbar or simply hit start
button and type what you know you want? Or remove all of the unwanted tiles
from the start screen? There are many thing you can do but everyone needs to
be honest: the start menu was never a small list of apps that was/is quick
to navigate - it is just familiar to everyone.



J



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]>
  On Behalf Of Daniel
Ratliff
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 8:40 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



Yeah the additions are all but useless, I do like that you can customize
and group the start screen icons a little better. You can also control what
moving into the corners does. I still don't like it as much as a traditional
start menu though. I want a nice concise list of all my apps and don't want
to have to search for them.



Daniel Ratliff



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:34 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



Have you played with the Start button or the boot to desktop in Windows 8.1
yet?  They may not be what you think they are. Both features are still tied
heavily to the Metro interface. I believe Microsoft is willing to live with
two steps forward and one step back.





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



Rod how did the dragging us kicking and screaming work out for Windows 8?
Not so great, which is why they brought back Start Menu and Boot to desktop
in Win 8.1.



It shouldn't be a company's role (ex: MS) to pull their customers into
something kicking and screaming, it's supposed to be the other way around.



Thank you.



Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ,
07310, United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 |
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 8:52 PM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser
vice



Two completely different areas, for one reason. Microsoft will drag us
kicking and screaming into the future - count on it.



Sent from Microsoft Surface Pro



From: Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 8:27 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



If we can get MMS back, why cant we swell up TechNet?



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:38 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



No one does.  But, what alternative do you have right now?





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:10 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



Not really, I don't want to rebuild labs every 6 months....



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:04 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



6 months is a pretty long time.





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:08 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



I think the intent is for ITPros to use the 180 day evals for their own
labs.



J



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 3:02 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



There's also the virtual labs.  You no longer have to maintain special
hardware.





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



Spinning up an Azure VM does not meet the requirement of MSDN software. I
can't test on my hardware, in my data center,  in my environment without
MSDN or paying for software. Microsoft is going to push this Azure crap too
hard and people are simply going to stop using MS software. People are
heavily invested in the Microsoft skillset but other than the bodies running
the systems there's no other real dependency upon Microsoft. We could just
as easily run on open source.









From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
service



Not really, when you think about it.  TechNet was used more for downloading
software than any of the other benefits.  You can spin-up a Windows Azure VM
and test the same software now.  No reason to have it on-premise for
testing.  Plus, the other options they are offering as replacements are all
free.



They are keeping MSDN, though (for a while), so you can subscribe to that
if you want to download bits.



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:37 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service



This is pretty terrible, TechNet yearly subscription was great.



http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-shut-down-technet-subscription-service-70
00017541/



Thank you.



Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ,
07310, United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 |
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended
as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market
prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or
accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or
statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase &
Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from
its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in
electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to
http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to
European legal entities.





  _____


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected
by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and
then delete it from your computer.



  _____


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected
by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and
then delete it from your computer.











  _____



DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary
user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind
1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.














The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.






The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.










Reply via email to