I think most of us know what it is and what it's not Jason :)
I assumed (wrongly) that with the version being incremented the client might have been. Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Jason Sandys [[email protected]] Sent: 24 September 2013 15:44 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades Please see my previous reply to this. “Ccmsetup is *not* the client agent installer so that’s not indicative of anything. Ccmsetup is simply a bootstrapper that initiates the download and installation of pre-reqs and the client itself (which is done by client.msi).” They don’t have an updated client.msi with CU3 included so there’s no way to distribute that, the only way to get to CU3 is by applying the msp. J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I'd agree with that too. what confused me was the version change of ccmsetup post cu3; if it did that why didn't the clients go straight to it...... Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]] on behalf of Kent, Mark [[email protected]] Sent: 24 September 2013 13:23 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades At the current rate, there will be 3-4x’s as many CU’s than SP’s. It would be nice if the client autoupgrade could handle this, rather than just SP’s. It seems like we are back to previous versions of SCCM as far as client upgrades go. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 5:45 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades agreed r2 would superceed cu3. I chose to let it create packages for the cu3 upgrade, then just created various collections with a standing advert for cu3, if the client version is less than cu3. Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]] on behalf of Daniel Ratliff [[email protected]] Sent: 24 September 2013 02:22 To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I would think R2 would supersede CU3? -Daniel Ratliff -----Original Message----- From: Marcum, John [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 09:19 PM Eastern Standard Time To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades How did you deploy the client update? Am I understanding correctly that after R2 is released and installed the CU3 update will need to be reinstalled? ________________________________ John Marcum Sr. Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:02 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I will say, props to MS for making this CU easy as pie. The wizard was a breeze and deploying the updates to clients was as well. Mike From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> On Behalf Of Stephen Leuthold Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:08 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades Yes, automatic client upgrade is only for major client versions like service packs. Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Stuart Watret<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 9/23/2013 5:54 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I was late getting to SP1, did it this Friday and noticed here that CU3 was out also; so applied that Saturday. So the notes on the CU update process clearly state that when clients get re-installed the CU update wll need to be re-applied. Which is fine I suppose; but prior to running CU3 I checked the version of ccmsetup.exe in the "Client" folder on the server. Post CU3 this version had been incremented which led me to hope that client upgrades push or auto would get CU3 straight away. Been using the auto update method since Saturday and the clients are only getting the SP1 update, I'm having to push separately CU3. Is this normal? Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
