I don’t even know what that means.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades One man's moose is another man's hamster J................ Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd _____ From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]] on behalf of Jason Sandys [[email protected]] Sent: 26 September 2013 02:47 To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades What does the number of CUs have to do with this? You are only ever deploying one. I agree it would be nice to have it done automatically, but the reality is that it’s not difficult to deploy and I would them spend engineering time on something that isn’t working instead of something trivial to do. J From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:33 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades It does seem that this would at least be a sensible check box to enable doesn't it? I guess you should speak to your TAM and get them to raise a DCR. Try to find someone large that this effects too. _____ From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:23:33 -0400 Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades At the current rate, there will be 3-4x’s as many CU’s than SP’s. It would be nice if the client autoupgrade could handle this, rather than just SP’s. It seems like we are back to previous versions of SCCM as far as client upgrades go. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 5:45 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades agreed r2 would superceed cu3. I chose to let it create packages for the cu3 upgrade, then just created various collections with a standing advert for cu3, if the client version is less than cu3. Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd _____ From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]] on behalf of Daniel Ratliff [[email protected]] Sent: 24 September 2013 02:22 To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I would think R2 would supersede CU3? -Daniel Ratliff -----Original Message----- From: Marcum, John [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 09:19 PM Eastern Standard Time To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades How did you deploy the client update? Am I understanding correctly that after R2 is released and installed the CU3 update will need to be reinstalled? _____ John Marcum Sr. Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP _____ From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:02 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I will say, props to MS for making this CU easy as pie. The wizard was a breeze and deploying the updates to clients was as well. Mike From:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> On Behalf Of Stephen Leuthold Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:08 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades Yes, automatic client upgrade is only for major client versions like service packs. Sent from my Windows Phone _____ From: Stuart Watret <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 9/23/2013 5:54 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] SP1 CU3 / Client Upgrades I was late getting to SP1, did it this Friday and noticed here that CU3 was out also; so applied that Saturday. So the notes on the CU update process clearly state that when clients get re-installed the CU update wll need to be re-applied. Which is fine I suppose; but prior to running CU3 I checked the version of ccmsetup.exe in the "Client" folder on the server. Post CU3 this version had been incremented which led me to hope that client upgrades push or auto would get CU3 straight away. Been using the auto update method since Saturday and the clients are only getting the SP1 update, I'm having to push separately CU3. Is this normal? Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd _____ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. _____ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
