Ivan,

 

Yes, sir. It's just a precaution, if nothing else. During my development /
testing period, I would regularly come across cases where I invoked
ccmsetup.exe asynchronously, and instead meant to launch it synchronously.
In those cases, I'd have to kill the async ccmsetup.exe (which was running
as a service, and probably just sleeping, waiting for content), to allow the
synchronous invocation to run successfully.

 

As long as there aren't any client installations or uninstallations running,
killing ccmsetup.exe should be relatively safe. Even then, ccmsetup.exe
simply calls out to other processes (eg. msiexec.exe, prerequisite files,
etc.), so it's not like you're interrupting any installation itself, just
the installation wrapper.

 

Cheers,

Trevor Sullivan 

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] R2 client upgrade question

 

Trevor, 

 

Curious as to why you killed CCMSETUP first?  As a best practice just in
case it's running still from a previous attempt?

 

Thanks.

 

Ivan Lindenfeld

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:41 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] R2 client upgrade question

 

Elias,

 

Yes, I just recently used a ConfigMgr client package to upgrade a customer
from Service Pack 1 to R2. The upgrade process went flawlessly.

 

I used a wrapper batch file that would:

 

1.       Kill ccmsetup.exe (if running) using taskkill.exe

2.       Launch ccmsetup.exe with the /NoService parameter

3.       Install Microsoft KB2905002 using msiexec.exe /update

 

There was some issue I ran into while trying to install KB2905002 using the
PATCH property, but I cannot recall what it was. That's why I just used
msiexec.exe

 

Cheers,

Trevor Sullivan 

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Elias Leal
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> 
Subject: [mssms] R2 client upgrade question

 

 

I am curious what everyone is doing with R2 client upgrades.

 

Outside of OSD and before addressing the R2 hotfix KB2905002, I am trying to
figure the best way to upgrade clients from the SP1 CU3 version
(5.00.7804.1400) to the initial R2 version (5.00.7958.1000). 

 

Some observations...

 

1. From previous email threads, I've notice recommendations to use
"Automatic Client Upgrade". However, when I enable this feature...there is
wording in the UI that says"Clients in slow or unreliable boundaries will
not be upgraded automatically". 

 

2. When I installed R2 on my lab primary site, there wasn't an option to
include a client installer package like how we saw with SP1 or CU3 site
installs (unless I missed that).  

 

So, I am trying to confirm if my observations are correct. And if so, what
is everyone doing with client upgrades in slow boundaries? Do we create a
package for them?

 

Thanks, 

 

Elias

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Reply via email to