Ya, not a great idea on the client updates being automatic. We had an issue a bit ago where an update to the SCEP client fubared the encryption software on our laptops. Not a great situation.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > > IMO.... Using more unique names for updates would help. I see CU1 for R2 > and CU1 for SP1 then I have to think "what came first SP1 or R2"? and so > forth. Next make all client updates use the automatic updates feature rather > than just some of them. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Huneycutt > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > > Having multiple product versions in market at once can definitely make things > confusing :) > 5.00.7958.1104 is an R2 hotfix (pre-CU1) > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2910552 > > John in your list below you have these (I've sorted earliest to latest) > 5.00.7711.0000 - 2012 RTM > 5.00.7804.1000 - 2012 SP1 > 5.00.7958.1000 - 2012 R2 > 5.00.7958.1101 - R2 hotfix 2905002 (superseded by 2910552. Both articles are > cross-referenced, and both in R2 CU1) > 5.00.7958.1203 - R2 CU1 > > Our KB articles for Cumulative Updates now contain all the version specific > details you should need to make identification easier, though we have not > retroactively added that info to older articles. > It looks like some of our individual hotfix KB articles don't explicitly call > out > the client version when it changes; we can work on correcting those. > What else should we consider to ease the confusion? > Thanks, > Brian Huneycutt > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > > Here's what I have. I think the way they are doing updates is a confusing > mess. > > 5.00.7958.1000 > 5.00.7958.1203 > 5.00.7711.0000 > 5.00.7804.1000 > 5.00.7958.1101 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > > yes, and somehow I am at an impossible version number. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrdogs/archive/2014/04/11/configmgr- > > 2012-version-numbers.aspx > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Center_Configuration_Manager > > > > > > Not from Microsoft direct, but these show the version numbers. > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:12 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > >> > >> you happen to have a link to the update you installed? I am doing > >> something wrong over here. > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kent, Mark > >> <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > I have 5.00.7958.1203, from one post R2 CU1 update. > >> > > >> > Mark Kent (MCP) > >> > Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer > >> > Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: [email protected] > >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:03 PM > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Subject: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1) > >> > > >> > What is the most recent client version? I have 5.00.7958.1104 > >> > > >> > I get ZERO hits when googling that version. > >> > > >> > /Todd > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by > the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then > delete it from your computer. > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by > the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then > delete it from your computer. > > > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by > the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then > delete it from your computer. > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by > the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then > delete it from your computer.
