I'm on 5.00.7958.1104 too - you didn't do it wrong.  The .1104 update was an 
update to the task sequence client that came in the form of KB2910552

Kenneth Merenda
Client Systems Architect | WH Information Technology
E: [email protected] | P: +1 281.405.1377 | M: +1 832.291.1314

         


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of SORENSEN, STANLEY
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)

+2



Respectfully,



Stan Sorensen

SCCM Server Administrator 

No statement should be believed because it is made by an authority. -Robert A. 
Heinlein



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kent, Mark

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:14 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)



+1



Mark Kent (MCP)

Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer

Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:00 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)



IMO.... Using more unique names for updates would help. I see CU1 for R2 and 
CU1 for SP1 then I have to think "what came first SP1 or R2"? and so forth. 
Next make all client updates use the automatic updates feature rather than just 
some of them.









-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Brian Huneycutt

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:01 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)



Having multiple product versions in market at once can definitely make things 
confusing :)

5.00.7958.1104 is an R2 hotfix (pre-CU1) 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2910552&k=rYVT%2BQIbByDGfw04ADASxQ%3D%3D%0A&r=iwCPqmnv3xogvUvZSbtYXgzrJtC0r3RO5jyWeBU6Kdc%3D%0A&m=xOg6cej5gDqRGQf%2B1JS%2BjJGZHJhOLJYCU%2BGAUnnm64c%3D%0A&s=d9af49c134fd137675068dbf7f3c1e4410687201449603bc8f0ddc049a5ab000



John in your list below you have these (I've sorted earliest to latest)

5.00.7711.0000 - 2012 RTM

5.00.7804.1000 - 2012 SP1

5.00.7958.1000 - 2012 R2

5.00.7958.1101 - R2 hotfix 2905002 (superseded by 2910552. Both articles are 
cross-referenced, and both in R2 CU1)

5.00.7958.1203 - R2 CU1



Our KB articles for Cumulative Updates now contain all the version specific 
details you should need to make identification easier, though we have not 
retroactively added that info to older articles.

It looks like some of our individual hotfix KB articles don't explicitly call 
out the client version when it changes; we can work on correcting those.

What else should we consider to ease the confusion?

Thanks,

Brian Huneycutt



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:30 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)



Here's what I have. I think the way they are doing updates is a confusing mess.



5.00.7958.1000

5.00.7958.1203

5.00.7711.0000

5.00.7804.1000

5.00.7958.1101













-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:22 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)



yes, and somehow I am at an impossible version number.



Thanks



On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrdogs/archive/2014/04/11/configmgr-&k=rYVT%2BQIbByDGfw04ADASxQ%3D%3D%0A&r=iwCPqmnv3xogvUvZSbtYXgzrJtC0r3RO5jyWeBU6Kdc%3D%0A&m=xOg6cej5gDqRGQf%2B1JS%2BjJGZHJhOLJYCU%2BGAUnnm64c%3D%0A&s=e5cb535da60d0f449ead05ea488148e82219ab5f9f5331c87c7152deb521463e

> 2012-version-numbers.aspx

>

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Center_Configuration_Manager&k=rYVT%2BQIbByDGfw04ADASxQ%3D%3D%0A&r=iwCPqmnv3xogvUvZSbtYXgzrJtC0r3RO5jyWeBU6Kdc%3D%0A&m=xOg6cej5gDqRGQf%2B1JS%2BjJGZHJhOLJYCU%2BGAUnnm64c%3D%0A&s=7d03ff0c9d14f4a3648a0563a0c5f697671b4360ccc7fedfc4a7ebe501cad27f

>

>

> Not from Microsoft direct, but these show the version numbers.

>

>

>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: [email protected]

>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell

>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:12 AM

>> To: [email protected]

>> Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)

>>

>> you happen to have a link to the update you installed? I am doing 

>> something wrong over here.

>>

>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kent, Mark 

>> <[email protected]>

>> wrote:

>> > I have 5.00.7958.1203, from one post R2 CU1 update.

>> >

>> > Mark Kent (MCP)

>> > Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer

>> > Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

>> >

>> > -----Original Message-----

>> > From: [email protected] 

>> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell

>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:03 PM

>> > To: [email protected]

>> > Subject: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)

>> >

>> >  What is the most recent client version? I have 5.00.7958.1104

>> >

>> > I get ZERO hits when googling that version.

>> >

>> > /Todd

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>

>











________________________________



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



________________________________



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.







________________________________



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



________________________________



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.








Reply via email to