I came up with a way to recover files, remotely using psexec. It was pretty easy.
-----Original Message----- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:19 PM To: Nash Pherson; mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection Add me to thay list and you now know an uphappy customer. The support is horrible. There's no central recovery point. Out of the box SCEP doesn't even tell thou what files it quarantined. CSS actually told me I'd have to go to each and every machine to clean and recover files. So, yes it's super easy to implement because it doesn't really have any features. It's a great product until you need it then you are screwed. Well, at least if something gets past it you are. And. ... If you have any virtual machines protect it doesn't integrate at the hyper visor level. ----- On Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nash Pherson <na...@nowmicro.com> wrote: SCEP is the easiest product to successfully manage, and of course you have already paid for it (not cheap... its actually horribly expensive... but you've already paid for it). While Kaspersky may have incrementally higher detection rates, the conversation really needs to be centered around whether or not Kaspersky is so much better that it warrants paying for two antivirus products. With almost every customer I've worked with, the business decision has been to go with SCEP and I have yet to see an unhappy customer. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 15:42 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection Thanks, I'm debating whether to rollout the new Kaspersky client or this once we go to ConfigMgr 2012. Kaspersky has had great detection rates for us and I'd hate to go with something that's just okay. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerlak, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:37 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection Same here it's a lot cheaper and the guys that do our pen test say it's better than the McAfee product we had. One thing I don't like is no way to see active file scans like you can in McAfee but no complaints at all. Love the product and easy of management and rollout. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:26 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection We moved 4 years ago and haven't looked back. Works as well if not better than the Symantec. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing and moving away from other anti-virus products. Nick Scott ________________________________ Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.
