it is now built in. you can recover certain files, certain files on certain
machines, etc.

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Michael Mott <[email protected]> wrote:

> I came up with a way to recover files, remotely using psexec.  It was
> pretty easy.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:19 PM
> To: Nash Pherson; [email protected]
> Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection
>
>
> Add me to thay list and you now know an uphappy customer. The support is
> horrible. There's no central recovery point. Out of the box SCEP doesn't
> even tell thou what files it quarantined. CSS actually told me I'd have to
> go to each and every machine to clean and recover files.
>
> So, yes it's super easy to implement because it doesn't really have any
> features. It's a great product until you need it then you are screwed.
> Well, at least if something gets past it you are.
>
> And. ...
> If you have any virtual machines protect it doesn't integrate at the hyper
> visor level.
>
>
> -----
> On Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nash Pherson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> SCEP is the easiest product to successfully manage, and of course you have
> already paid for it (not cheap... its actually horribly expensive... but
> you've already paid for it).
>
> While Kaspersky may have incrementally higher detection rates, the
> conversation really needs to be centered around whether or not Kaspersky is
> so much better that it warrants paying for two antivirus products.  With
> almost every customer I've worked with, the business decision has been to
> go with SCEP and I have yet to see an unhappy customer.
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 15:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection
>
> Thanks, I'm debating whether to rollout the new Kaspersky client or this
> once we go to ConfigMgr 2012. Kaspersky has had great detection rates for
> us and I'd hate to go with something that's just okay.
>
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gerlak, Matthew
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:37 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection
>
> Same here it's a lot cheaper and the guys that do our pen test say it's
> better than the McAfee product we had.
> One thing I don't like is no way to see active file scans like you can in
> McAfee but no complaints at all.
> Love the product and easy of management and rollout.
>
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Aubrey
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:26 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection
>
> We moved 4 years ago and haven't looked back.  Works as well if not better
> than the Symantec.
>
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection
>
> I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with
> other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing
> and moving away from other anti-virus products.
>
> Nick Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is
> addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this
> message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
> email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This
> email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The
> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it
> contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd.
> Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other
> contract.
>
>


Reply via email to