I'm in pretty much the same situation. I do all server and sccm. We have a network engineer, A desktop/network admin and everyone else in support is a contractor. ~250 users now but was > 500 3 weeks ago.
Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Steve Whitcher<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 10/27/2014 10:41 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Staffing We're probably a very small organization, compared to most that use SCCM. (We used SCE until Microsoft killed it off, and it was a good fit for our ~275 users/devices.) As such, our situation is probably very different from the average IT dept using SCCM. We have a 5 person IT dept, including helpdesk, desktop tech, manager, data analyst, and sys admin. Our desktop tech does occasionally create and deploy a new application, and regularly moves computers into collections for re-imaging. Beyond that, as the Systems Administrator, I'm pretty much the only one who does anything with our SCCM servers. Of course, I also manage all of our other servers, with one or two exceptions. I have no doubt that if I had more time to dedicate to just SCCM we could get a lot more out of it, but as it stands serves our needs for deploying os images, updates, and applications. Steve On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Bradley, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried search the archives, and couldn’t find anything. > > > > I’m curious as to how other organizations handle their SCCM staffing. Do > you have dedicated SCCM administrators? Do you have separation of duties > (patch management, OSD, application packaging, etc.)? > > > > > >
