Why would you do user based apps with no requirement rules? May as well be doing packages then.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups no requirement rules, UDA, don’t have it configured. > On 8 Jul 2016, at 13:44, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > What are your requirement rules? Have you configured UDA? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 6:45 AM > To: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Subject: [mssms] Apps to user groups > > I appreciate this is 101 for most of you, and I assumed the same ! > > On 1602, and just moving from Packages to Applications (no laughing). > > Been through about 10 of our core pieces of software now running as > “Applications" - all of them advertised to computer collections - all good. > > Done another two this morning advertised to collections based on AD groups - > nothing new here, been doing it for years with packages, but today - nothing. > > None of the apps advertised to user groups as available are showing up in > either App Cat or the new Software Centre. > > Have I missed a fundamental here? > > Ta > > Stuart > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected > by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and > then delete it from your computer. >
