* New Software Centre with merged apps for user and system * Nicer look with Icons * Better/Easier detection rules * I could go on…….
Tried just with a user, no joy. > On 8 Jul 2016, at 16:04, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why would you do user based apps with no requirement rules? May as well be > doing packages then. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups > > no requirement rules, UDA, don’t have it configured. > >> On 8 Jul 2016, at 13:44, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What are your requirement rules? Have you configured UDA? >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Stuart Watret >> Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 6:45 AM >> To: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> Subject: [mssms] Apps to user groups >> >> I appreciate this is 101 for most of you, and I assumed the same ! >> >> On 1602, and just moving from Packages to Applications (no laughing). >> >> Been through about 10 of our core pieces of software now running as >> “Applications" - all of them advertised to computer collections - all good. >> >> Done another two this morning advertised to collections based on AD groups - >> nothing new here, been doing it for years with packages, but today - nothing. >> >> None of the apps advertised to user groups as available are showing up in >> either App Cat or the new Software Centre. >> >> Have I missed a fundamental here? >> >> Ta >> >> Stuart >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected >> by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this >> message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and >> then delete it from your computer. >> > > >
