Ranges work best From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] Site Assignment Issues
I thought 'IP Range' was the recommended implementation because Subnet and Site Only posed issues. Maybe I'm remembering wrong... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Chris Barnes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hey guys – Have an interesting one for you. I am doing an SCCM Migration at a client. They have 4 existing SCCM sites (1 2007 Central, 2 2007 Child Primary’s, 1 2012 Primary), plus the new 1602 site I just built. I am seeing some issues with site assignment as it relates to client push. I am needing to use an IP Address Range to get the client to be assigned, using a subnet as a boundary isn’t working. There was some existing boundary overlap, I believe I have cleaned all of that up. All sites are publishing correctly. I have made sure that before I add a boundary to the new site, I have removed it from any of the existing sites. Is there anything else that I am missing? Chris Barnes Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant • 248.767.4415<tel:248.767.4415> cell • [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> • http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
