If we were able to get this into AD Sites and Services, you can supernet there, and use the AD site as the boundary, right?
Chris Barnes Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant • 248.767.4415 cell • [email protected] • http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 5:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] Site Assignment Issues Actually, it does. You just use an IP Address range for that. You can’t use a subnet *ID* for that because subnet IDs cannot be used to model aggregate subnets this way – this really has nothing to do with ConfigMgr itself other than their choice of having the ability to use subnet IDs. J From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Massardo Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 5:00 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] Site Assignment Issues We do use ranges for some areas but most of our boundaries are subnets. Are you trying to “supernet” some subnets together within SCCM? I.e. putting in 10.1.0.0 as a boundary to cover both the 10.1.2.0/24 and 10.1.3.0/24 subnets? If so, SCCM doesn’t support this technique. Thanks, James Massardo From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:37 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] Site Assignment Issues We’ve always used IP ranges, maybe this was why. I don’t recall. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 1:21 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] Site Assignment Issues I thought 'IP Range' was the recommended implementation because Subnet and Site Only posed issues. Maybe I'm remembering wrong... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Chris Barnes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hey guys – Have an interesting one for you. I am doing an SCCM Migration at a client. They have 4 existing SCCM sites (1 2007 Central, 2 2007 Child Primary’s, 1 2012 Primary), plus the new 1602 site I just built. I am seeing some issues with site assignment as it relates to client push. I am needing to use an IP Address Range to get the client to be assigned, using a subnet as a boundary isn’t working. There was some existing boundary overlap, I believe I have cleaned all of that up. All sites are publishing correctly. I have made sure that before I add a boundary to the new site, I have removed it from any of the existing sites. Is there anything else that I am missing? Chris Barnes Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant • 248.767.4415<tel:248.767.4415> cell • [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> • http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
