Hi Sherry, this is pure WSUS - what I’m expecting is intelligence in the scan 
to say, hey I know, I only need January’s, cause it’s cumulative and has all I 
need.

HNY btw :)

On 13 Jan 2017, at 13:52, Sherry Kissinger 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

My Guess; and it's just a guess...
Superseded <> Expired
If you have those superseded updates in your deployment update group, depending 
upon where in the install chain that particular client chose to install an 
update, it *might* install November, December, than January.  Instead of 
"January", then "oh, I have November and December already, moving on"  Which is 
what you want to happen.

If you want to avoid that, remove the superseded updates from your update 
group, so only the latest is available.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Stuart Watret 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I try not to think about patching too much, I’ve been fairly successful.

I thought the new patch paradigm was cumulative?

I was refreshing a reference image in MDT yesterday, a couple of days after 
January’s patches were out.

The screen cap below shows my client picking up Novembers patches, clearly 
marked as superseded in the wsus console.

Have I got it wrong?

Cheers

Stuart

<unknown.png>




--
Thank you,

Sherry Kissinger

My Parameters:  Standardize. Simplify. Automate
Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com<http://www.mofmaster.com/>, 
http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger, 
http://www.smguru.org<http://www.smguru.org/>



Reply via email to