Makes sense, although there were a few people here using it for Servers. I think it also depends on your Firewall, Content Filter, and also Windows Firewall and UAC. Local Admins does pose a problem as well. Really depends how else you're hardening your clients and servers...
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Thelen, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > We were using SCEP/FEP for our clients and ESET for our servers for about > 4 years with about 3k clients. > > > > We had more infections in 4 years than we did in 10 years with other AV > software. In 2015 we had over 800 infections with 300 of those SCEP could > not remove or clean. A good portion of these infections we found due to > the infection attempting to move to our file servers where ESET was > catching, blocking, and reporting it. Last year we switched to another AV > product and have only had 1 infection that it was not able to remove. > > > > But, also on the other hand, all of our users are…./shudders…local admins > which does have a big impact on infections. We are working on changing > that, but we still have about 2k users that are still local admins that > have not had any infections with the new AV software. > > > > So, everyone here is still a big supporter of separate AV software for > clients and servers, and am sure you can see why J > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2017 9:08 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] Endpoint Protection (SCEP) for servers > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I've used SCEP in the past on client machines and it worked great - no > complaints. This is after moving them off of Sophos. At that time we > didn't move it to Servers as our Network Admin wasn't confident in it. > > > > Just curious if others are using SCEP for servers? Thoughts, concerns? > Any gotchas? > > > > Thanks! > > > >
