Well... It seems to have lots of trouble with initializations. Basically, using "class foo = bar;" does not select the proper constructor, you must explicitly code it like "class foo(bar);" before it works properly. There's also some code I had rearrange parentheses and arguments before the post-increment stopped generating a gratuitous decrement out of the ether. And, no, there wasn't any ternary expressions, aliasing or side-effects involved -- it just generated bad code. I know there's one more example, but I'm having trouble remembering just what it was now.
I suppose I'll miss Visual Assist the most. I've tried KDevelop and, unless it's been greatly improved lately, it's code editor, well, sucks. I'd rather use VI (gvim) than it. The worst thing about it was that it would start inserting your typing in a different place than where the cursor was after being in use for a few hours. Mucking up my code is something I just will *not* put up with. Ciao, Dee -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Grenyer Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] gcc & QT (was Re: RE: [msvc] using bit fields) Hi > P.S. Although disparaging Redmond is one of my favorite pastimes, I can say > I've found a few bugs in GCC and am quite less than impressed with QT. Maybe > my standards are too high... Yes, QT is not good. What problems have you found with gcc? Regards Paul Paul Grenyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk Have you met Aeryn: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk/aeryn/? Version 0.3.0 beta now ready for download _______________________________________________ msvc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription changes, and list archive.
