Hi > Well... It seems to have lots of trouble with initializations. Basically, > using "class foo = bar;" does not select the proper constructor, you must > explicitly code it like "class foo(bar);" before it works properly.
I'm afraid I'm not quite with you here. Could I see some more explicit code, please? > There's > also some code I had rearrange parentheses and arguments before the > post-increment stopped generating a gratuitous decrement out of the ether. > And, no, there wasn't any ternary expressions, aliasing or side-effects > involved -- it just generated bad code. I know there's one more example, but > I'm having trouble remembering just what it was now. Which version were you using? 2.9x? Regards Paul Paul Grenyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk Have you met Aeryn: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk/aeryn/? Version 0.3.0 beta now ready for download
