Hi all,
>I don't think a fastest routine contest makes much sense,
>let's have a shortest routine contest instead. The fastest
>mul16 routine would probably be to do the same thing 16 *
>and not even use a loop of some sorts, while the shortest routine would be
>a real challenge!
Ofcourse this makes sense. With this fast multiply routine one could write
faster apps/games/demos. The no. of cycles a routine takes to i.e. draw a
screen is VERY important on our MSX. You only have a limited no. of cycles
compared to PCs and stuff ("just buy a faster processor if it runs too
slowly").
Gtx
Tristan Zondag
a.k.a. Omega of Techno Crew | iMpACt BBS: +31-599-661-471 | MSX
a.k.a. Omega of Dreamscape | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | THE BEST
8-BIT
