On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz wrote:

> Why did he used memman? Isn't direct control of the Memory Mapper faster?

Faster indeed. But eigther you only use one mapper, which is a serious
limitation, or you have to search all the memory yourself, which makes it
about just as fast.

I did write my own memory manager, because the one from MST is not really
capable of switching page 0. It was indeed quite a job, though. And I will
have to rewrite it when I make a multi-tasker, so I need to know which
program reserved the memory (so I can unmark it in case of a crash).

Bye,
shevek

---
Visit the internet summercamp via http://polypc47.chem.rug.nl:5002


****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to