] Why did he used memman? Isn't direct control of the Memory Mapper faster?
I used memman to make fastcopy compatible with any other memory hungry
program that used memman. At the time that I wrote fasctopy 3.0, memman was
still a very promising initiative. Too bad that most people choose to ignore
it. Memman is fast enough for the memory mapper control. Provided that you
use some tricks ;-). Perhaps that the need for these tricks where the main
reason why most people ignored memman. It was rather complicated to support
memman and still have a good performance.
Kind regards,
Alex Wulms
--
Alex Wulms/XelaSoft - MSX of anders NIX - Linux 4 ever
See my homepage for info on the *** XSA *** format
http://www.inter.nl.net/users/A.P.Wulms
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
