On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, shevek wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, shevek wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For the most part of diskroms, DMA can be in page 1, because they have
> > > > access to FDC through addresses 7FF8h-7FFCh and also BFF8h-BFFCh, and they
> > > > transfer a small routine to F1BFh (or something like that) that allows a
> > > > disk transfer to happen in page 1.
> > > 
> > > Is that MSX-standard or just the case on many MSXs?
> > 
> > The standard doesn't say anything about the method that the diskrom should
> > use. So, it's just the case on many MSXs. The standard only says that the
> > interface should use memory addresses to transfer data between CPU and
> > FDC.
> 
> Ok, but this means that using DMA in page 1 is against MSX standard, or
> not?

Given that the standatd doesn't say anything about this, it's not against
the MSX standard!

Greetings from Brazil!

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz        http://www.lsi.usp.br/~mdalpoz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   "Apple" (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton

    /"\
    \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
     X  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
    / \


****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to