At 15:22 01/07/99 +0200, you wrote:
>> Anyway, it would suffice for images on most webpages wouldn't it? a page
>> with images bigger than that should be banned anyway...=)
>
>Ofcourse, but you can resize large images to small ones, not vice versa.
>It was more expensive than other cameras which are in fact much better. Only
>this one has a diskdrive in it for floppies. Easy, ok, I definately agree on
>that. But nice-looking, no. Definately not. By the way, it's very large and
>quite heavy (for a camera).
Well, u can have a GOOD resize algorithm working, like Linear
Intepolation, Lanczos2 and 3 (these last two are very expensive ones), n' u
won't feel many differences from the original image.
________________________________________________________________________
Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro - ICQ UIN:3635907 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]|_Sola Scriptura |
http://i.am/rjp -M.Sc. Numerical Modelling (hope so!) |_ Sola Gratia |
UFF - Niteroi - RJ - Brazil - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _| Sola Fide |
MSX, ST, B5, X-F, Anime, Christian, Maths, CuD, Linux!_| Solo Cristi |
Christian, Rock, Comics, Transformers, and hate M$! | Soli Deo Gloria |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
