At 05:46 PM 7/12/99 +0200, you wrote:
>> For those still telling there is no perfect msx emulator, please try
>> BrMSX... And maybe you will think differently...
>
>That was not my point.
>
>An emulated MSX, even on another computer called MSX isn't a _real_ MSX.
But why?
Is it purely emotional?
By the way, I will try BrMSX to see if it deserves to be called "perfect".
Bye,
Maarten
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
- Re: New MSX: The "Educar" Project... Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: New MSX: The "Educar" Project... Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro
- Re: New MSX: The "Educar" Project.... Laurens Holst
- Re: New MSX: The "Educar" Proj... Rainier Maas
- "philosophical" view of em... Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: "philosophical" vi... Antoni Burguera Burguera
- Re: "philosophical" vi... TFH
- Re: "philosophical&quo... Laurens Holst
- Re: "philosophical... Alex Wulms
- Re: "philosophical... Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: "philosophical... Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: "philosophical... TFH
- Re: "philosophical... Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: "philosophical... TFH
- Re: "philosophical&quo... David Heremans
- Re: "philosophical... TFH
- Re: "philosophical... Daniel Jorge Caetano
- Re: "philosophical... TFH
- Re: "philosophical... Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro
- Re: "philosophical... TFH
- Re: "philosophical... Laurens Holst
