On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:55:41 +0200, Laurens Holst wrote:
>> This is nice... But has the backdrop of the speed. And this is not nice.
>P.E.,
>>Must takes almost 30 seconds to compile under my K6-233Mhz... On the
>>MSX... Well... I will not even try.
>P.E.??? What's that???
Per Example. I was talking about MUST (Music Station, from Ricardo Bittencourt.
>30 SECONDS on a K6-233??? Talking about a lacking optimization... ("bwoa,
>the people using this program have an P3 500 MHz anyway" standard
>PC-programmers attitude)
>My source of Strategic Army takes 30 seconds to compile on my MSX... So this
>source of yours would be at least 100 times as large as the SA-source???
>Don't think so.
No, it's not really so big. And not takes so much time. (-: But it is "compressed",
and takes a lot of time, more than normal programs.
>Compass is, exept for WBASS, the fastest assembler ever made on MSX. And if
>they would tokenize the code, then it would be... Whow.
I don't get the idea... How to tokenize ASM? Get an hex editor and you do not even
need to assembly it!
[]'s Daniel Caetano
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
