> >> Of course. But we could make a screen split. Screen 8 (or better
> >> screen 7) for the graphics and screen 2 or screen 0 for the text. It
> >> would be very fast.
> AB>
> AB> It seems a good idea.
>
>I thought that the best option is to use SCREEN 6 for the text. It is as
fast
>as SCREEN 5 but it has SCREEN 7 resolution (nice fonts!).

Well that is indeed a nice idea to use a screensplit for.

However, the VRAM management in screen 6 & 7 differs a lot from eachother.
Keep that in account.


~Grauw


--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
          email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
             visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
MSX fair Bussum / MSX Marathon homepage: http://msxfair.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to