Grauw wrote:
>> Yes, I did see that you write articles for XSW. I only wanted to
>> prove my point that people, in general, are directly willing to write
>> new articles for MCCsomething, but not for an existing magazine and
>> you did want to write a new article for MCCW, but not for us.
>
>Hello? Ding dong are you there???
>
>Who was talking about reading things better before writing???
>I write for XSW! It already exists! Dah?
>
>I wanted to write after Track stopped, and I chose XSW, not FD.
>And I really want to support this new project so yes, indeed, I want to
>write for that too.
>
>~Grauw
I did read before reacting. I did read that you write articles for
XSW (see my reply). I did prove my point that you are NOT willing
to write for us, but ARE willing to write for MCCsomething.
PLEASE before this gets out of hand (I said this, you said that,
etc.), read again what I stated in my earlier reply:
Jeroen Smael wrote:
>Let me state again that this is not a personal vendetta against
>anyone or anything (MCCW)! This is just a sad remark that people are
>only willing to write down interesting things concerning MSX when
>they hear that MCCM will rise from it's grave.
The only reason for posting my messages is to shake people awake.
If people have interesting stuff to write about MSX, they should
not wait until some magazine 'of the old days' raises again (no
offense meant towards MCCM!), they should write it and publish it
(either via internet, mailinglist, newsgroup or (disk)magazine).
The sad thing is that this doesn't happen.
I rest my case (before this gets out of hand).
Jeroen 'sad but true' Smael
FutureDisk
Homepage: http://www.futuredisk.msxnet.org/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
