> > Frames and ugly graphics have nothing to do with correct HTML,
> > and when used correctly, frames can give very good results.
>
> I know. I wanted to say that nowadays ppl seem to be more focused
> on having the latest plug-outs on their page that having useful info.
> (looks in favour over contents). I've seen it a lot: some sh**
> edited in M$ Word, "save as..."-> html. _That_'s a real nightmare...
Owww yes I know what you mean! Nightmare indeed!
They should write a book about it... "how to multiply the size of your HTML
by a factor of 10"...
Jeez man a simple <P> tag takes 1.5 lines of options, and all headings are
redefined with not-backwards-compatible CSS StyleSheet tags (but then why
don't they also define the <P> there?)...
> > > Anyone want to make an X-server for GFX9000? Now that would be cool...
> >
> > If you are referring to a VT100 terminal,
>
> There still is a slight difference between X and VT100 :-)
> X is a graphic environment - like the Win9x desktop, but much more
> flexible...
Oh, you mean X-windows?
I get it. There also was something else with X in it on Unix (Unix itself?
:)), which looked like telnet, and I bet it also supported ANSI.
~Grauw
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
